Legal Battle Over Cyber Defamation, Jang Won Young vs. ‘Sojang’

Thread
Last updated:

The legal dispute between IVE’s Jang Won Young and ‘Sojang’ escalates, with the Seoul Central District Court setting a date for the first appeal trial on September 4.

Initiated by Jang Won Young and Starship Entertainment in November 2022, the lawsuit accuses ‘Sojang’ of cyber defamation.

Allegedly, ‘Sojang’ posted 23 videos between October 2021 and June 2023 containing false claims and derogatory remarks about Jang Won Young and other celebrities. Among these were accusations of jealousy and professional sabotage, sparking significant public backlash.

Prosecutors uncovered that ‘Sojang’ generated substantial revenue, part of which was used for real estate acquisitions. Despite claims of protected speech, attempts to conceal evidence raised doubts about ‘Sojang’s’ defense strategy.

Allegations against 'Sojang' include false claims and malicious content
Allegations against ‘Sojang’ include false claims and malicious content

Earlier this year, Jang Won Young secured partial victory in her 100 million KRW damages claim, but ‘Sojang’ appealed, prolonging the legal standoff.

Starship Entertainment remains steadfast in seeking justice, rejecting settlements to uphold cyber defamation standards. They stress the case’s importance in shaping legal precedents amid growing concerns over online misinformation and its impacts on public figures.

Jang Won Young’s recent song “Blue Heart” from IVE’s EP “IVE SWITCH” sparked speculation due to its lyrics seemingly referencing the legal battle with ‘Sojang.’ Despite this distraction, IVE’s comeback has been well-received, particularly their track “HEYA,” signaling resilience amidst legal challenges.

Written by Liam Bennett Editing, Kpop, Content, Strategy, Trends, Leadership Liam Bennett has 7+ years of experience in digital media editing and holds a degree in Journalism with advanced training in editorial strategy and content management.

Liam Bennett oversees K-pop content with a focus on editorial consistency and structural clarity. He reviews and refines articles to ensure accuracy, coherence, and alignment with audience expectations. His approach combines content oversight with performance awareness, ensuring material meets both quality and engagement benchmarks.

THREAD

Share your take. All comments are held for review before appearing.

Be the first to share your thoughts.